Beloved of the Neuberger’s, one heading the House of Lords Science and Technology Select Committee, Julia Neuberger, the other, David Neuberger heading the Supreme Court. The former heads behaviour change in the Lords, the latter ensures Supreme Court policy concurs. What on earth could they have been be up too back in 2013, could it be about changing the way you behave, specifically to medical instruction, to have you stay indoors at command, that you distance yourself from all others outside the family, and upon command from a talking head on the TV, you must take a medical procedure that as an extra kick, the benevolent authorities will insert into your biological system, the means to ID you as Person within the brand new electromagnetic system being set up all around you and of course, in your homes? Graphene Hydroxide anyone?
Since Cameron and Clegg the Crown has moved to change your behaviour to accept the changes it intends to force through, or, medical dictatorship. The Science and Technology Select Committee met to give life to a policy of Behaviour Change, for the population and the civil service, and through education direct to the children.
Behaviour change has been a Crown agenda since the installation of the Cameron-Clegg coalition. Now under pandemic, they intend to medicate that change. Back in 2012 we found a sinister group of Lords moving to change the behaviour of the populations. Of course the idea of government changing minds is nothing new but medicating behaviour change in the schools…..?
Behavioural medicine as presented by the Institute for Government, deceptively holds the pretence that they are speaking of advice to help a person get onto a better health plan. They fail to connect medicine as in medication, in their push for behavioural change to suit the policies of the corporate crown, which we get second hand… believing it to be from the elected government sitting in Parliament.
Manipulating fear to ensure the group think mind overruns the autonomous being. If you are smart, you will be labelled special needs. Asch conformity experiment, controlling the populations behaviour
The Royal Society is the Church of the new order, its creed and law is the science of inversion, of culture, religion, the family and life. The Royal Society, from their 2010/11 accounts, show clearly, the society is dependent upon government handouts to the tune of £48.782, a staggering 67% of its budget.
In 2012 we learned of a sinister group of Lords moving to change the behaviour of the UK population. Of course the idea of government changing minds is nothing new but medicating behaviour change to get the outcome they want, outside of some form of psychiatric institution, most certainly is. A step down from the House of Lords we found the main agenda of the Cameron/Clegg coalition was to change the behaviour of the British public to accept the serfdom of the new world under climate taxation.
Human behaviour is a major determinant of health. Factors that influence health related behaviours and people’s adaptive responses to disease and illness are becoming better understood. This understanding is leading to behaviourally based interventions targeted at the level of the individual and at service delivery, with impacts on both. Yet there is much more to do. In the United Kingdom the Society of Behavioural Medicine has been set up to promote research into and the use of well founded behavioural interventions.
If you wanted find older data in relation to having you obey your doctor as a behaviour change requirement, see Suelette Dreyfus and Julian Assange. Hacking, madness and obsession on the electronic frontier ‘Gripping, eminently readable.. Dreyfus has uncovered one of this country’s best kept secrets and in doing so has created a highly intense and enjoyable read’—Rolling Stone
Pope’s admission of genocide demands all assets move to the Vatican bank to secure the debt to China levied against the western nations and person. Under the terms of the International Criminal Court (ICC) should it be known that genocide has occurred, then those responsible, either as individuals or as officers of the institution or corporation must be prosecuted and punished. Another act that can be brought against the perpetrator is to seize all assets under the “avails of crime’ statutes.