Parity on contract human rights laws allowing a merge with mental health in UK for mandatory vaccination

Posted by Sean on 7th December 202020th August 2023

7 December 2020

You just cannot make this stuff up. Not content with the harrying of the global population in lockdown and muzzle, no, the priesthood has sent out its will through four sinister characters in a paper sent into the UK parliament which argues that a move to the acceptance of a mandatory vaccination program across the population, would not be in breach of either English Common Laws on rights nor those within the European Convention on Human Rights. The only mechanic that needs to be employed is to merge the Mental Health body of contractual laws as relates to the sectioning and enforced medical interference, with the latter laws on human rights and the rights of an Englishman.

I presented a link to what was a committee paper on the UK government’s website below one of my recent videos with the intention of making a video on the paper itself. When I came to do just that, the paper below had been removed off the government website leaving this message :

Basically, you have to be very special to invert a right into a medical interference, yet it has to be said, in the four contrary minds that produced the following paper, that sentiment is more than satisfied.

The Cast
Professor Thomas Douglas : the ethics of creating and using human-animal Chimeras.
Isra Black ‘Children’s Consent’ : expert in relieving the parent from the position of holding the power of attorney over your offspring.
Jonathan Pugh : Deep Brain Stimulation
Lisa Forsberg : Centre of Medical Law and Ethics, King’s College London. Motivational interviewing to increase family consent to deceased solid organ donation.

Expertise

Thomas Douglas : Rapid advances in gene-editing and stem-cell technology have expanded the range of possible future applications in human-animal chimera research. Most notably, recent developments may allow researchers to generate whole personalised human organs in pigs for the purpose of transplantation into human patients. Though human-animal chimera research in small animals, such as mice, is routine, human-animal chimeric techniques are now increasingly being applied to larger animals. Moreover, these chimeras include increasing amounts of human material, which is potentially present in more morally significant locations, such as the brain and the reproductive system. These developments raise important ethical questions about whether we should create such chimeras, and if so, how we should treat them. Answers to these ethical questions are needed to inform the development of policies regulating human-animal chimera research and its applications. Here, we provide a review of some of the most important or widespread ethical concerns.
Talk : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaYqPJGjpy0

Isra Black : ‘Children’s Consent’ :
https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/research-and-subject-groups/childrens-consent-philosophy-and-law-conversation

https://pure.york.ac.uk/portal/en/projects/childrens-consent-a-philosophical-and-legal-study(30115a67-1f12-431a-a75a-33fe9ac3063e).html

Jonathan Pugh : Deep brain stimulation and revising the Mental Health Act : Under the current Mental Health Act of England and Wales, it is lawful to perform deep brain stimulation in the absence of consent and independent approval. The case for intervention-specific safeguards : https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry/article/deep-brain-stimulation-and-revising-the-mental-health-act-the-case-for-interventionspecific-safeguards/15620772799C248560089F36C6D69F7B

Jonathan Pugh : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7286862/
deep brain stimulation

Lisa Forsberg : Would it be ethical to use motivational interviewing to increase family consent to deceased solid organ donation? Motivational interviewing to increase family consent to deceased solid organ donation :

We explore the ethics of using motivational interviewing (MI), an evidence-based, client-centred and directional counselling method, in conversations with next of kin about deceased solid organ donation. After briefly introducing MI and providing some context around organ transplantation and next of kin consent, we describe how MI might be implemented in this setting, with the hypothesis that MI has the potential to bring about a modest yet significant increase in next of kin consent rates. We subsequently consider the objection that using MI in this context would be manipulative. Although we cannot guarantee that MI would never be used in a problematically manipulative fashion, we conclude that its use would, nevertheless, be permissible as a potential means to increase next of kin consent to deceased solid organ donation. We propose that MI be trialled in consent situations with next of kin in nations where there is widespread public support for organ donation.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lisa_Forsberg3

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257813679_Would_it_be_ethical_to_use_motivational_interviewing_to_increase_family_consent_to_deceased_solid_organ_donation

The conclusion arrived at by the four inmates is that Government will have to form Primary Legislation and pass it to sanction a mandatory vaccination.

Compulsory vaccination for Covid-19 and human rights law

Download as PDF

Video Overview :