What has power in the Legal Civil systems of nations? is it the Law or the Law of the Sea? Or have we missed the fact that today it is the Holy See?
March 30 2018, the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund discussed a staff paper entitled Considerations on the Role of the SDR. The SDR is an international reserve asset, created by the IMF in 1969 to supplement its member countries’ official reserves. As of September 2017, 204.2 billion SDRs (equivalent to about $291 billion) had been created and allocated to members. SDRs can be exchanged for freely usable currencies. The value of the SDR is based on a basket of five major currencies—the US dollar, the euro, the Chinese renminbi (RMB), the Japanese yen, and the British pound sterling.
In short the following thesis aims to show there are two types of idea of a monarch, each based upon a particular understanding of the deity they worship. One example, and the example from the time of the pre-flood antediluvian era called Shemsu Hor, retains absolute power for the established priesthood through a front or proxy monarch, the second holds love as the ultimate ideal. From the two classifications of deity we shall discuss, on the one hand is born a complete and total dictatorship, fixed like a merry go round which of its own will cannot escape itself, and secondly, a system in which rights and the protection of the individual are absolute for the establishment and the nation as a whole. I believe they are building Shemsu Hor again on the landmass Antarctica which means they are readying for another great catastrophe.
Is there a much bigger agenda when it comes to the destruction of Syria? The supposed chemical attack in Syria happened days after the Trump administration reversed its demand for regime change and as leaders moved to meet in Brussels to discuss the rebuilding of Syria, one could say the European meet was initiated as a direct result of the chaos rampaging through Europe from Islamic radicals making up a large portion of refugees, including mass rapes riot and looting. Clearly stopping this meeting benefited a lot of interconnecting agendas.
So Donald Trump is Jewish, his line from Frankfurt, he has more Zionist’s in his cabinet than would be expected from the right. We have Theresa May, unelected, yet running my beloved Isle, Germany being destroyed by Merkel. Funny thing is the elites to which all of the above represent also control Russia, China, India ad infinitum, or should I remind that we do have around four nations in North West Africa not tied to the IMF, but who cares?
China has openly offered Russia a military alliance against NATO, yet China is controlled by the same cabal that is strangling the West and controls NATO. We must consider that the cabal of monopolist’s that have controlled much of the West for at least 500 years, shifted the western industrial and manufacturing complex to China and India. The rise of China is not some form of divine justice, it is the new global power for the same banking cabal we are becoming aware of today. They want war…
A Chinese news channel has employed an artificial intelligence robot as a weather reporter on its live breakfast show, raising concerns among the country’s journalists as they foresee a threat their jobs. More worryingly for local Chinese reporters, the threat to their careers may dwarf the one faced by their peers in other countries like US where robots are employed to write the news, because China has only state controlled media.
A detailed review of the road to a one world government and religion through the secret society networks, headed by the illuminist web of global control.
To bring about a two sided world in the geopolitical war theatre of today, I would suggest can only be achieved if the European settled Muslims can be dragged into the same ideology to that of IS.
Two ways this can be achieved :
1. European Muslims agree and do become the mindset of IS
2. The elite through the media, can convince the Europeans that it is the case that European born and settled Muslims are of the same agenda as IS.
The document presents a huge drive to expand copyright enforcement, which will ultimately lead to the criminalisation of common online activities leading to the main thrust of the contract which give the corporate state the means to infringe your freedom of expression. This will be achieved through internet censorship should your video, report or story, utilise the work of another. It is easy to see how it is intended to be used for censorship when you study the chapter on intellectual property rights which aims to en-mass stifle the contract signatories through the removal of the fair use provisions that are necessary to protect freedom of speech.