29 August 2020
List of 34 scientists all of whom have been affiliated with, or funded by, Jeffrey Epstein through the MIT, and who also vigorously promote, implement and are the beneficiaries of the coronavirus pandemic and its consequences. Take especial note of the fact, none of the below scientist’s are expert in the fields of Virology (study of viruses) or Epidemiology (study of epidemics) :
Barish, Barry Uni. Of California, Caltech experimental physicist
Chomsky, Noam Harvard MIT linguist, philosopher, cognitive scientist, historian
Church, George MIT, Harvard geneticist, molecular engineer, chemist
Dawkins, Richard Oxford ethnologist, evolutionary biologist
Dennett, Daniel Harvard, Oxford, philosopher, writer, cognitive scientist
Gardner, Howard Harvard, developmental psychologist
Goertzel, Ben Temple University, mathematics, AI researcher
Gross, David Uni. of California, theoretical physicist
Harrington, Anne Harvard, Oxford, history of psychiatry neuroscience and cognitive science
Hawking, Stephen Oxford, Cambridge, theoretical physicist, cosmologist
Hillis, Danny MIT, computer science, computer engineering
Ito, Joi MIT (unqualified), Head of MIT Media Lab – resigned
Kosslyn, Stephen Harvard, psychologist, neuroscientist, expert on science of learning
Krauss, Lawrence MIT, theoretical physicist, cosmologist
Lander, Eric MIT, Harvard, mathematician, geneticist
Lanier, Jaron NMSU (unqualified), computer scientist
Lieber, Charles Stanford, Harvard, nanotechnology
Myhrvold, Nathan Princeton, applied mathematics
Negroponte, Nicholas MIT, architect
Nowak, Martin Harvard, mathematical biologist
Peebles, James Princeton, theoretical cosmologist
Pinker, Steven MIT, Harvard, cognitive psychologist, linguist
Randall, Lisa Harvard, MIT, theoretical physicist, cosmologist
Reif, Leo Rafael MIT President, electrical engineer
Sacks, Oliver Oxford, neurologist, naturalist, science historian
Schank, Roger Yale, ILS, AI theorist, cognitive psychologist, learning scientist, education reformer
Shimony, Rony Uni of NY, cardiologist
Smolin, Lee Harvard, theoretical physicist
Spiropulu, Maria Caltech, Harvard, CERN, physicist
Summers, Lawrence MIT, Harvard, economist
Thorne, Kip Princeton, theoretical physicist
Trivers, Robert Harvard, evolutionary biologist, sociobiologist
Wilczek, Frank MIT, theoretical physicist, mathematician
Scientists who have no links whatsoever with Jeffrey Epstein, say this :
Silver bullet 76
Online petitions have been launched in several countries to end curfews and other encroachments on basic rights. At the same time, critical video contributions, even by doctors, are increasingly being deleted. In Berlin, a registered event on fundamental rights, at which the German constitution was distributed, was terminated by the police.
Dr John Ioannidis: Much of the published research does not reach good scientific standards
Prof Wittkowski: ‘it’s a struggle to get heard’.
Kohnlein ‘I have seen Italian doctors online, where I have compelling suspicions something isn’t right with what they say.’
https://worldtruth.tv/stop-the-fear-mongering-20-medical-experts-quest ioning-the-coronavirus-panic/?fbclid=IwAR3Qn2lpyvVKCEF_C7mZ9aFRvVNLmZQ Z0NpDPBZ-WqSaRyE41HLA-FTn1LE
Press Statement by Dr Vandana Shiva, 7 September 2020Research Foundation for Science Technology and Ecology
New GMOs which are gene edited are being rushed to the market on the claim that they are “natural” on the grounds that the editing of genes cannot be tested.
A new paper published today, 7 September, has obliterated that claim, using a highly sensitive and highly accurate quantitative test for the first commercialised gene edited crop: SU Canola.
This is the first open source detection test for a gene-edited GM crop.
New gene edited GMOs are being introduced to cover up the failure of old GMOs – the failure of Bt cotton to control pests and the failure of Roundup Ready crops to control weeds. Instead, industrial agriculture is now faced with the unmanageable problem of superpests and superweeds. They are also aimed at creating a new narrative for genetic engineering while maintaining the genetic determinism and genetic reductionism paradigm on which genetic engineering is based. They extend the illusion of mechanistic determinism in the attempt to “engineer” complex, living, self organised systems. They are also an attempt to bypass GMO regulation.
Bill Gates is funding new GMO technologies, including gene editing and gene drives and has made investments in Editas, a company that controls patents on the new GMO technologies. Along with DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projets Agency), he is promoting the use of gene drives for deliberate extinction of species.
In the Foreign Affairs issue of May/June 2018 an article “Gene Editing for Good: How CRISPR Could Transform Global Development”, Bill Gates argues that massive investments are necessary to support gene editing for “accelerating research that could help end extreme poverty by enabling millions of farmers in the developing world to grow crops and raise livestock that are more productive, more nutritious, and hardier”.
Similar Claims were made about the old GMOs. The failure of Bt Cotton is now recognised by the scientific community.
The European Court of Justice on 25th July 2018 had ruled that CRISPR is a gene modification technology and needs to be regulated like all GMOs.
 Chhalliyil, P.; Ilves, H.; Kazakov, S.A.; Howard, S.J.; Johnston, B.H.; Fagan, J. A Real-Time Quantitative PCR Method Specific for Detection and Quantification of the First Commercialized Genome-Edited Plant. Foods 2020, 9, 1245. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/9/9/1245
 Wray, Adam . “How To Prepare Your Company For The Internet Of Things.” Forbes Technology Council Editors. Last modified February 14, 2017. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2017/02/14/how-to-prepare-your-company-for-the-internet-of-things/.
Dali Lama at MIT