Salman Abedi, the Manchester Suicide Attack, the facts


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It must be fully understood before you read this report, that the U.K Intelligence service and the government did not want the name of this suicide bomber released. This report will explain why that is the case. If it was not for the American press release of his name, we might have been fed another load of misdirection. Thank you America..

It is being reported that arriving back in Britain on 18 May,  Salman Abedi would move to launch his suicide attack on the city of Manchester some four days later. He was aged 22 carried out the attack on the 22 and would kill 22 people, including children.

Detectives say they have built up a “detailed picture” of his movements since he came back to Britain on 18 May but have yet to release the information. There is no accountability from the security services, they are a law unto themselves. This is what we needs to change.

The bomber, Salman Ramadan Abedi, was a 22-year-old British Muslim of Libyan ancestry. He was born in Manchester on 31 December 1994 to a family of Libyan-born refugees who had settled in south Manchester after fleeing to the UK to escape the government of Muammar Gaddafi. He grew up in the Whalley Range area and lived in Fallowfield. According to The Times, Abedi had been among a group of students who had accused a teacher of Islamophobia for criticising suicide bombing. Neighbours described the Abedi family as very traditional and “super religious”. Abedi, his elder brother, and, prior to 2011, his father, attended Didsbury Mosque. An imam at the mosque recalled that Abedi looked at him “with hate” after he preached against ISIS[1] and Ansar al-Sharia in 2015.

Abedi attended Burnage Academy for Boys in Manchester between 2009 and 2011, before going to The Manchester College until 2013 and then Salford University in 2014.

He was known to British security services but was not regarded as a high risk according to MI5. A community worker told the BBC he had called a hotline five years before the bombing to warn police about Abedi’s views and members of Britain’s Libyan diaspora said they had “warned authorities for years” about Manchester’s Islamist radicalisation. Abedi was allegedly reported to authorities about his extremism, by as many as five people, including community leaders and possibly family members.

Ramadan Abedi, the father of the Manchester suicide bomber Salman Abedi has a very interesting role in the world of Islamic terrorist groups.

Born in Gubbah in eastern Libya and a member of the Abedi tribe he served as Sgt. Major under Gaddafi. He was known to be a pious man and interconnected with the Islamist networks. In 1991 he left Libya to settle in what is known as the Saudi Wahhabi paradise where he trained Mujahideen soldiers to fight against the Najibullah government after the withdrawal from Afghanistan by Soviet Russia.

In 1992 the Mujahideen demolished and then entered the city of Kabul and also Hekmatyar. From here Ramadan Abedi travelled to London and on up to Manchester, in Manchester he was tied with the Libyan Islamist Diaspora which centred upon the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG).
Another Manchester resident, Abu Anas Al-Libbi was a connection for Obeidi, an Al Qaeda affiliate who would become the brains behind the Al Qaeda attacks in Kenya and also Tanzania in 1998.

The LIFG is proscribed by Britain as a terrorist organisation which seeks a “hardline Islamic State” in Libya and “is part of the wider global Islamist extremist movement, inspired by al-Qaida”.

The “smoking gun” is that when Theresa May was Home Secretary, LIFG jihadists were allowed to travel unhindered across Europe and encouraged to engage in “battle”: first to remove Mu’ammar Gadaffi in Libya, then to join al-Qaida affiliated groups in Syria.

Last year, the FBI reportedly placed Abedi on a “terrorist watch list” and warned MI5 that his group was looking for a “political target” in Britain.

The Manchester attack  reveals the alliance between MI5 and Radical Islamic groups, especially the sect known as Wahhabism or Salafism, with the leading lights and financiers being the kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which also happens to be Britain’s biggest weapons customer. As such, the same agreement invested by the U.S and the Saudi regime, which ensures the Saudi oil is sold in the Dollar, is also being upheld by the U.K government, which like all governments today is but an arm of the Intelligence services that protects the Saudis to keep afloat the Dollar.

In 2011, according to Middle East Eye, the LIFG in Manchester were known as the “Manchester boys”. Implacably opposed to Mu’ammar Gadaffi, they were considered high risk and a number were under Home Office control orders better understood as house arrest, when anti-Gadaffi demonstrations broke out in Libya, a country forged from myriad tribal enmities. Suddenly the control orders were lifted. “I was allowed to go, no questions asked,” said one LIFG member. MI5 returned their passports and counter-terrorism police at Heathrow airport were told to let them board their flights.

The real reason the United States moved against Gaddafi, was due to his independence and his plan to abandon the petrodollar. He had planned to underwrite a common African currency backed by gold, establish an all-Africa bank and promote economic union among poor countries with prized resources. Whether or not this would have happened, the very notion was intolerable to the US as it prepared to “enter” Africa and bribe African governments with military “partnerships”. AFRICOM, which is an arm of the U.S and NATO, facilitated this whole affair on the ground.

While training the Mujahideen Ramadan connected with Abdelhakim Belhaj, former Mujahideen soldier and extremely close to Zbigniew Brzezinski’s creation, Osama Bin Laden, it would be Belhaj that would persuade Ramadan Abedi to return to Libya.

With the destruction of the Libyan regime by NATO[2] Ramadan Abedi joined the Al Umma party lead by Sami al Saddi, one of the LIFG’s highest commanders, and again through his connection with Belhaj would become close to the Grand Mufti himself, and highest spiritual authority for the hardcore Islamist drive to build the caliphate, Sadeq al Ghariani.

In 2014 Ramadan Abedi was a part of the Islamist raid that would secure the airpot at Tripoli, his son and Manchester bomber Salman Abedi flew from Manchester to ensure he was involved in the action, he was shot and was treated in Turkey.

Ramadan was connected to the Benghazi Defence Brigades, a mix of Islamists from Katiba 17, an organisation financed from Qatar, which has a very interesting story not being told by the mainstream, involving a British Mercenary overseeing what appears to be the birth of an even more radical ideology based on Taliban principles in Idlib, Syria. Finance from Qatar was heavily involved in the Benghazi revolution against Gaddafi. Mixed with katiba 17 would be Ansar al Sharia, the group responsible for the 2012 attacks on the U.S Consulate in Benghazi.

Taking the lead role in the Libya regime change on behalf of NATO would be the French and the U.K governments, led respectively by Sarkozy and David Cameron.

In the U.K the minister that would sanction Ramadan and his rat lines to send Libyan Islamists back to Libya to fight against Gaddafi, would be Theresa May. Lord Carlisle, the former independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that it was a “grave mistake” by the coalition government to remove control orders. In 2011, as the home secretary, Theresa May, announced control orders would be replaced by less restrictive terrorism prevention and investigation measures (Tpims). This was so they could concentrate on Syria and Libya, a position that would lead to putting foreign policy before the safety of the population

Clearly Ramadan and his son Salman Abedi are assets of corporate intelligence. Are we to believe they went rogue? Or as the evidence would suggest, Salman was an asset used to further the road to full blown dictatorship on behalf of the elect for whom the intelligence services operate?
With Donald Trump clearly taking sides with the Zionist elite and the Saudi Wahhabi dictatorship in a move against the Shia of Iran and Syria, are western governments planning to create the chaos required to activate the emergency platforms already in place and tested?

War requires absolute control of the civilian populations, the emergency platforms, such as the U.Ks Contingency Act 2004, would satisfy this requirement. In the United States they have the Patriot Act, both giving absolute Legal authority for the privately owned corporations that today are nested in our domestic civil systems, to take full and complete control over nations.

This ladies and gentlemen is what fascism looks like.

Contraries 
Firefighters claimed they were forced to wait over 90 minutes before accessing Manchester Arena to help victims. Furious fire teams had to watch the atrocities unfold on television because they were “stopped” from entering the arena. This action has never been an emergency protocol, something was going on that the Firefighters were not allowed to see.

Witness on the mainstream news reported 2 bangs. But that fact seems to have disappeared from the entire mainstream media with many mainstream articles physically removing that from their reports. However; it can still be found in cached version on the “way back machine”.

Here’s a Twitter feed from a witness :

Alan Brennan
Two loud bangs heard around Manchester arena. People running out of the arena. No idea what’s going on

Erin Cauchi‏
I work @nbcnews. Are you okay? Did you film this? Can NBCU have permission to use it on our platforms & partners?

Alan Brennan
Im fine, I live in an apartment across the way from the arena so heard it quite clearly. You can have permission.
Source

Outlined by 21WIRE, the Manchester Arena attack appeared to have been ‘uncannily timed’ as it coincided on the same day as the OSCE-wide Counter-Terrorism Conference 2017 in Vienna, Austria.

A eyewitness testimony conflicts with details from the official story, as one mother, Emma Johnson, was at the top of the foyer protected by glass waiting for her young daughters noticed a suspicious man with “risen bits” under his clothing and as the alleged perpetrator also wore a “bright red top in the crowd with a grey panel down the front,” according to her statement.

What transpired after the US leaks of the Manchester terror incident appeared to muddy the narrative, as the story quickly changed from lone wolf status to that of a ‘larger network’ while the bomber was seen on CCTV with dark clothing, not matching the description above.

As of 11 June, all those arrested since the bombing have been released without charge.

There is no need to use suicide bombers to hit soft targets. It is very easy to position a bomb and then leave, then by mobile telephone, activate the bomb. 

There is no live video of the explosion, nor is there any of the attacker.
If the explosions were indeed presented through the speaker system, as has been suggested, then the controlled explosion carried out by the police outside the arena, would be to convince the all in the surrounding area, by definition of them hearing a bang, that a bomb had indeed gone off. The time of such would be irrelevant to those in the outer areas, they would hear an explosion and accept the official narrative :

 

 

 

 

 

 

Screen shot taken 29 May 13:15 PM

British Intelligence was warned by the FBI :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Who Gains
As a genetic programming in the British culture, the Right always equates with security and militarism. Was it really in the interests of Theresa May to announce a snap election as Parliament was dissolved? She timed it for her having no political opposition because it is the summer recess, and she then offers only seven weeks for the population to decide who to give their vote, great timing but was this a good enough paradigm to secure victory before the Manchester attack?

The event has indeed heightened the fear levels and so naturally, folks look to the right to offer them protection. After the event, May has bolstered her chances of victory, launched military on the streets, added vigour to her demand for internet censorship, satisfied the bankers, evidenced in the short term manipulated currency expansion, and she has secured her position in the Trump drive to gather the ten kingdoms to the Zionist call to war against Iran, Russia, North Korea, and maybe even China.

Jeremy Corbyn is a communist and has ties to the Intelligence controlled IRA and has sought to release Hama from the British terror list. Corbyn, while declaring good and sound policies, is an advocate of the equally communist United Nations, in fact he ceaselessly overturns British law in favour of legislation coming out of the U.N. The United Nations is a corporation, corporations are the physical representation of the Central Banking system. Zionism is the clear political thesis of the Central Banks, which equates to monopoly of property and goods and the enslavement of the populations under the corporate legal system. It is one side of the capitalist –  Communist wand, each leading to monopoly of all life. Under Corbyn the Brexit demand from the British population will die a short death, the immigration will continue, terror attacks will increase and the implementation of the Sharia Law, coveted as a social control system by the bankers, will continue to gain political protection and facilitation by the U.K corporate government.

Regardless which political party gets in after the June election, the winners are clearly the Zionist elect.

Note

[1] The Clinton Foundation receives money from Saudi backers who also finance ISIS .Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has been publicly accusing Saudi Arabia and Qatar of funding ISIS. Several reports have detailed how private Gulf funding to various Syrian rebel groups has splintered the Syrian opposition and paved the way for the rise of groups like ISIS and others.

The Clinton Foundation accepted millions of dollars from seven foreign governments during Hillary Rodham Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state, including one donation that violated its ethics agreement with the Obama administration, foundation officials disclosed Wednesday.

Most of the contributions were possible because of exceptions written into the foundation’s 2008 agreement, which included limits on foreign-government donations.

DynCorp is a corporation claimed to have been involved in the funding of ISIS. Trump Economic Adviser Billionaire Steve Feinberg owns DynCorp through Cerberus Capital.

Former Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney’s (D, Georgia) courageous 2006 grilling of Donald Rumsfeld about the trillions of dollars missing from the Pentagon, as well as DynCorp’s involvement in the sex trade and human trafficking:

“Mr. Secretary, I watched President Bush deliver a moving speech at the United Nations in September, 2003 in which he mentioned the crisis of the sex trade. The President called for the punishment of those involved in this horrible business. But at the very moment of that speech, DynCorp was exposed for having been involved in the buying and selling of young women and children. While all of this was going on, DynCorp kept the Pentagon contract to administer the smallpox and anthrax vaccines, and is now working on a plague vaccine through the joint Vaccine Acquisition Program. Mr. Secretary, is it policy of the US government to reward companies that traffic in women and little girls?”

[2] September 2016, a House of Commons Foreign Affairs Select Committee inquiry concluded that then Prime Minister David Cameron had taken the country to war against Gaddafi on a series of “erroneous assumptions” and that the attack “had led to the rise of Islamic State in North Africa”. The Commons committee quoted what it called Barack Obama’s “pithy” description of Cameron’s role in Libya as a “shit show”.

In fact, Obama was a leading actor in the “shit show”, urged on by his warmongering Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, and a media accusing Gaddafi of planning “genocide” against his own people. “We knew… that if we waited one more day,” said Obama, “Benghazi, a city the size of Charlotte, could suffer a massacre that would have reverberated across the region and stained the conscience of the world.”

Further Study
Zionism
Idlib Syria, a new idea of Islam is being born, Dar al-Harb
Islam