When your government becomes a corporation everything turns upside down. Australia is no exception to that rule, in fact it would be fair to say that since 1901 and the incorporation of Australia, they relieved themselves of Great Britain the nation and became another agent of the fully incorporated United Kingdom Crown Corporation via the Federal Reserve system.

With health fully privatised in Australia, or at least that will be the correct status when they get 17 million Australians to allow the realm of the private-corporate to have all their medical data, that data will become available to all and sundry, including the now private and thus foreign entities calling themselves the Police.

You can see the human microchip on its way folks if this agenda is not opposed to its death. The following report gives insight to what the future holds in a world under artificial intelligence in full control of all private Police and other animals. Australians…smell the coffee..

Bill Bowtell along with other international public health experts is extremely worried about the legislation governing My Health Record.[1]

My Health Record
Members may have seen recent reports about the Federal Government’s new “My Health Record”.

My Health Record is an online summary of your key health information.

When you have a My Health Record, your health information can be viewed securely online, from anywhere, at any time – even if you move or travel interstate. You can access your health information from any computer or device that’s connected to the internet.

Whether you’re visiting a GP for a check-up, or in an emergency room following an accident and are unable to talk, healthcare providers involved in your care can access important health information without limitation, such as :

all medical test results such as pathology/blood tests
all past medication lists and medicines you are taking
x rays
allergies
hospitalisations
treating doctors
all medical conditions you have been diagnosed with
The federal government contends this can help you get the right treatment. You don’t need to be sick to benefit from having a My Health Record. The federal government contends it’s a convenient way to record and track your health information over time.

This year, you will get a My Health Record unless you tell the federal government you don’t want one.

If you don’t have a My Health Record, and don’t want one created for you, you can opt out between 16 July and 15 October 2018. Find out how you can opt out here.

The issue for members of the QPU is Section 70 of the My Health Records Act provides for the grounds that you’re My Health Record can be released.

It reads, (QPU’s emphasis added):

“70 Disclosure for law enforcement purposes, etc.

(1) The System Operator is authorised to use or disclose health information included in a healthcare recipient’s My Health Record if the System Operator reasonably believes that the use or disclosure is reasonably necessary for one or more of the following things done by, or on behalf of, an enforcement body:

(a) the prevention, detection, investigation, prosecution or punishment of criminal offences, breaches of a law imposing a penalty or sanction or breaches of a prescribed law;

(b) the enforcement of laws relating to the confiscation of the proceeds of crime;

(c) the protection of the public revenue;

(d) the prevention, detection, investigation or remedying of seriously improper conduct or prescribed conduct;

(e) the preparation for, or conduct of, proceedings before any court or tribunal, or implementation of the orders of a court or tribunal.

As you can see, the mere investigation of a criminal offence or breach of law, or the investigation or remedying of seriously improper conduct or prescribed conduct are legitimate grounds for investigators to access you’re My Health Record.

This means that any police officer under investigation for a criminal offence or under investigation for seriously improper conduct will have their My Health Record be able to be accessed by investigators.

This means that you’re My Health Record may be able to be accessed if you are being investigated for disciplinary matter.

The QPU will never tell you to “opt out” or “stay in”, that is your choice entirely however be aware if you do not opt out of My Health Record that investigators such as ESC or the CCC will be able to access you’re My Health Record as a matter of course without warrant, without your knowledge or without even your permission or consent. Find out how you can opt out here
Source

Note
[1] Bill Bowtell along with other international public health experts are extremely worried about the legislation governing the My Health Record.

Bob was an architect of Australia’s world-leading response to HIV and AIDS when he was senior adviser to Health Minister Neal Blewett in the 1980s. Between 1994 and 1996 Bill was senior political adviser to Prime Minister Paul Keating. When Bill is worried, I pay attention.

“I was involved in the precursor to the My Health Record and I recall that you came along to meetings to offer advice and views,” Bowtell told me.

“At that time, it was strongly held that such a change could only be brought about on the basis of absolute trust as between clinicians and patients, and that centralised records could only be accessed by health professionals … and that no other external agencies could access the system for any reason. Somewhere along the way, however, the police and other agencies including the ATO have decided that they must have warrantless access to this treasure trove of data.

“These provisions break the bond between clinician and patient. The idea that police and security agencies, and the ATO and other agencies could trawl these databases at will is abhorrent. To its great shame, the Parliament passed these provisions.”

Could this be true? In the original legislation, Section 70 of the Act, there it is:

“The System Operator is authorised to use or disclose health information included in a healthcare recipient’s My Health Record if the System Operator reasonably believes that the use or disclosure is reasonably necessary for one or more of the following things done by, or on behalf of, an enforcement body :

(a) the prevention, detection, investigation, prosecution or punishment of criminal offences, breaches of a law imposing a penalty or sanction or breaches of a prescribed law;
(b) the enforcement of laws relating to the confiscation of the proceeds of crime;
(c) the protection of the public revenue;
(d) the prevention, detection, investigation or remedying of seriously improper conduct or prescribed conduct;
(e) the preparation for, or conduct of, proceedings before any court or tribunal, or implementation of the orders of a court or tribunal.”

Excuse me? What could “protection of public revenue” possibly have to do with enhancing the healthcare of an individual, or protecting public health? Rhetorical question I know, but to avoid any confusion, the answer is: nothing.

Any court or tribunal? That could mean domestic violence cases, family court, employment disputes. What could that possibly have to do with the rights of the individual whose health record is to be disclosed without a warrant or court order? Again … nothing. Full Story

Further Study
Trade V Commerce
Understanding The Jurisdictions Of Court
Jurisdiction Maritime (Commercial) Law
Health