Psychiatrists and professors are lobbying to normalise and decriminalise paedophilia


Brain and Neurons

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

27 October 2015

Judith Reisman DB
Psychiatrists and professors are lobbying to normalise and decriminalise paedophilia (child rape and molestation). You heard right.

The movement to legitimise paedophiles has been gathering steam for some time.
In the late 1980s, for example, during the two years I spent as principal investigator for a U.S. Department of Justice study on Images of Children, Crime and Violence in mainstream pornography, my research team encountered a stable of paid pornography agents we dubbed Academic Paedophile Apologists.

Like carnival hawkers, these Academic Paedophile Apologists college professors, psychiatrists and other mental-health professionals have served as advisers, writers and expert witnesses, telling medical, academic, public school, court and government authorities that the barbaric paedophile crimes of child sexual abuse are harmless and, some said, beneficial.

Now, things have gone so far downhill that this May, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) was walking the Academic Paedophile Apologist tightrope, actually publicly debating a proposal for Lifting [The] Pedophilia Taboo.

Several APA presenters proposed removing pedophilia, exhibitionism voyeurism from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM).

The DSM the bible of the mental-health field tells psychiatrists, judges, juries and the rest of the world what is or is not abnormal human behaviour, and what to criminally punish versus what to therapeutically treat.

Meanwhile, these experts on treatment are meeting at the University of Indiana’s Kinsey Institute (long seen as a circus side-show) July 11-19 for two big sex confabs.

The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development is lavishing $26,000 on a Kinsey conference on sexual arousal to develop guidelines for measurement of sexual response.

The NICHHD seems unconcerned that measurement of sexual response was Alfred Kinsey’s exact excuse for unleashing a gang of his favourite pedophiles to measure orgasms on hysterically weeping, convulsing and fainting children who Kinsey argued, enjoyed the experience.

July 16, after the arousal sexperts wrap up, the International Academy of Sex Research (IASR) will gather, also emceed by Kinsey Institute director Dr. John Bancroft.

Bancroft’s credentials include a British accent, employed to suavely bury the horrifying truth about the rapes and sexual torture of 317 to possibly 2,035 infants and children by Institute founder Alfred Kinsey’s sex researchers in the late 1940s.

Joining Bancroft on the podium will be Theo Sandfort, the IASR president and Scientific Program Committee chairman. Sandfort’s qualifications include having been a well-known member of the editorial board of Paidika, the Journal of Paedophilia.

Sandfort shares this dubious editorial honour with Kinsey Institute conference keynoter Verne Bullough, as well as Bill Andriette, the editor of The NAMBLA (The North American Man-Boy Love Association) Bulletin.

The journal editors wrote in 1987, The starting point of Paidika is necessarily our consciousness of ourselves as paedophiles.

Paidika pledged to advance paedophile  consciousness as a legitimate and productive part of the totality of human experience.

Paidika’s regular graphic ads for NAMBLA clearly illustrate the sexual component of what they euphemistically call man-boy-love.

Again, in his 1991 book Male Intergenerational Intimacy, IASR President Sandfort maintained that neither he nor the other book authors view man-boy relationships as necessarily pathological.

Now, just as sex guru Dr. Kinsey turns out to be a certifiable sexual psychopath, anyone who believes that sex professors are just objective, high-minded intellectuals has never attended a sex conference.
I recall the sex orgy reports among sexperts during the formal sex conferences I attended (after they’re critiquing of hours of pornographic films).

At one sex conference in Wales, all of the attendees signed a letter of protest when our Welsh cleaning staff refused to work if child molesters were allowed to academically pontificate on paedophile rights and studies.

If sex arousal research is funded by NICHHD, a federal child welfare agency, how many paedophiles at this Kinsey Institute sex bash will quietly imitate their founder and initiate similar studies of child sexual response measurements?

Every American parent and grandparent had best beware the sinister plans of leaders in the American Psychiatric Association, the Kinsey Institute and their many clones.

This class of sexperts is transforming sexual fictions into crippling sexual facts.

An international caravan of Academic Paedophile Apologists are on the march and your children are their targets. 

Further Study
Removing the strongman, the spiritual battle
In Profile : Wilhelm Wundt, Psychological Programming of Children
Psychiatry and its Views on Education
The Polanski Culture : Hollywood’s Push To Normalise Sex With Children
EIM Group European Investment Managers, Absolute Return for Kids, and the Dutroux child sex abuse Scandal 
Why You Must keep Out of the Realm of Mental Health, Calls for Euthanasia for the Mentally Ill
Origin Of Throwing Children Into The Fire, Tay-Sachs, Molech And The Khazars